<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>PCIT Cannot Direct Penalty Under Section 270A Without AO&#039;s Finding of Under-Reported Income</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86533</link>
    <description>The ITAT quashed a revision order under s263 issued by the PCIT directing initiation of penalty proceedings under s270A for under-reported income. Following Chennai Metro Rail Ltd., the Tribunal held that the PCIT cannot invoke s263 without the AO first recording a finding regarding under-reporting of income under s270A(2). While the AO had initiated penalties under s271B and s271F, no determination of under-reported income was made. The PCIT improperly substituted his judgment for the AO&#039;s discretion, as the AO had deliberately chosen not to initiate s270A proceedings. The revision order was therefore invalid and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2025 08:41:26 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2025 08:41:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=806481" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>PCIT Cannot Direct Penalty Under Section 270A Without AO&#039;s Finding of Under-Reported Income</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86533</link>
      <description>The ITAT quashed a revision order under s263 issued by the PCIT directing initiation of penalty proceedings under s270A for under-reported income. Following Chennai Metro Rail Ltd., the Tribunal held that the PCIT cannot invoke s263 without the AO first recording a finding regarding under-reporting of income under s270A(2). While the AO had initiated penalties under s271B and s271F, no determination of under-reported income was made. The PCIT improperly substituted his judgment for the AO&#039;s discretion, as the AO had deliberately chosen not to initiate s270A proceedings. The revision order was therefore invalid and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2025 08:41:26 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>