https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767300 Denial of cross-examination in proceedings under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act was held not to vitiate the adjudication because natural justice is flexible and depends on demonstrated prejudice. The deciding question was whether the affected party showed actual or likely prejudice from the refusal; absent such showing, the procedural objection fails. The fact that documents had been supplied and an opportunity to appear was given supported substantial compliance with fair procedure. On those facts, the interlocutory orders were sustainable and the challenge to the adjudication did not succeed. en-us Tue, 14 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Mar 2025 08:41:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767300 Denial of cross-examination in proceedings under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act was held not to vitiate the adjudication because natural justice is flexible and depends on demonstrated prejudice. The deciding question was whether the affected party showed actual or likely prejudice from the refusal; absent such showing, the procedural objection fails. The fact that documents had been supplied and an opportunity to appear was given supported substantial compliance with fair procedure. On those facts, the interlocutory orders were sustainable and the challenge to the adjudication did not succeed. Case-Laws FEMA Tue, 14 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767300