<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 687 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767301</link>
    <description>NCLAT Chennai dismissed an appeal challenging the rejection of recall applications against an approved resolution plan. The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing but held that once the resolution plan approval order dated 30.05.2022 was affirmed by appellate courts and the appeal process concluded with the appellant&#039;s withdrawal before the SC, the order attained finality. The Tribunal ruled that subsequent recall applications claiming fraud were not maintainable as the judgment had been stamped and finalized through the appellate process, precluding further challenge regardless of when fraud knowledge was acquired.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2025 08:41:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=806442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 687 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767301</link>
      <description>NCLAT Chennai dismissed an appeal challenging the rejection of recall applications against an approved resolution plan. The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing but held that once the resolution plan approval order dated 30.05.2022 was affirmed by appellate courts and the appeal process concluded with the appellant&#039;s withdrawal before the SC, the order attained finality. The Tribunal ruled that subsequent recall applications claiming fraud were not maintainable as the judgment had been stamped and finalized through the appellate process, precluding further challenge regardless of when fraud knowledge was acquired.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>