https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767313 The HC concluded that the rejection of the petitioner's refund claims by the respondent authority was unjustified due to the dismissal of the pending appeal (CEA No. 26 of 2024). The Court emphasized that the dismissal of the appeal by the Division Bench removed any legal basis for rejecting the claims. Consequently, the HC set aside the impugned order and directed the respondent authority to conduct a fresh hearing and issue a new order regarding the refund claims, ensuring compliance with prior judicial determinations. en-us Thu, 06 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Mar 2025 08:41:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767313 The HC concluded that the rejection of the petitioner's refund claims by the respondent authority was unjustified due to the dismissal of the pending appeal (CEA No. 26 of 2024). The Court emphasized that the dismissal of the appeal by the Division Bench removed any legal basis for rejecting the claims. Consequently, the HC set aside the impugned order and directed the respondent authority to conduct a fresh hearing and issue a new order regarding the refund claims, ensuring compliance with prior judicial determinations. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 06 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767313