<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (9) TMI 53 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42114</link>
    <description>The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad ruled in a case involving the seizure and confiscation of foreign-origin synthetic fabrics. The court found that the show cause notice for confiscation was not issued within the prescribed six-month period as required by Section 110(2) of the Customs Act, rendering the retention of seized goods illegal. Emphasizing the importance of timely notice delivery, the court referenced relevant case law and concluded the case solely on the non-compliance with the notice time limit. The writ petition was disposed of, with costs imposed on the parties, highlighting the significance of adhering to procedural requirements and time limits under the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 11:58:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (9) TMI 53 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42114</link>
      <description>The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad ruled in a case involving the seizure and confiscation of foreign-origin synthetic fabrics. The court found that the show cause notice for confiscation was not issued within the prescribed six-month period as required by Section 110(2) of the Customs Act, rendering the retention of seized goods illegal. Emphasizing the importance of timely notice delivery, the court referenced relevant case law and concluded the case solely on the non-compliance with the notice time limit. The writ petition was disposed of, with costs imposed on the parties, highlighting the significance of adhering to procedural requirements and time limits under the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>