https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767337 The HC set aside the impugned order rejecting the petitioner's stay on the recovery of disputed tax and remitted the matter back to the respondent for fresh consideration. The Court emphasized adherence to procedural guidelines established in the Queen Agencies case, which requires the assessing officer to properly evaluate stay petitions under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act. The Court ordered that no coercive steps be taken against the petitioner to collect the disputed tax pending the appeal, instructing the respondent to pass orders in accordance with the law within three months. en-us Tue, 18 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Mar 2025 08:41:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767337 The HC set aside the impugned order rejecting the petitioner's stay on the recovery of disputed tax and remitted the matter back to the respondent for fresh consideration. The Court emphasized adherence to procedural guidelines established in the Queen Agencies case, which requires the assessing officer to properly evaluate stay petitions under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act. The Court ordered that no coercive steps be taken against the petitioner to collect the disputed tax pending the appeal, instructing the respondent to pass orders in accordance with the law within three months. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 18 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767337