<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 730 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767344</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of Section 16(4) of the CGST Act and KGST Act, together with Rule 61(5) and related notices and orders, was withdrawn after the petitioner sought to avail recent amendments and the Government amnesty scheme. The HC dismissed the petition as withdrawn and reserved liberty to the petitioner to pursue the benefit sought under the memo.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 14:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=806399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 730 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767344</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of Section 16(4) of the CGST Act and KGST Act, together with Rule 61(5) and related notices and orders, was withdrawn after the petitioner sought to avail recent amendments and the Government amnesty scheme. The HC dismissed the petition as withdrawn and reserved liberty to the petitioner to pursue the benefit sought under the memo.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>