<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 2081 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461109</link>
    <description>The cost of goods supplied during repair and replacement of damaged container parts could not be added to the taxable value of the repair and maintenance service where the invoices separately showed labour and material charges and the materials used were supported by the record. The dispute was treated as covered by the appellant&#039;s earlier final order on the same issue, and the addition of repair material cost to the taxable value was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 17:01:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=806297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 2081 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461109</link>
      <description>The cost of goods supplied during repair and replacement of damaged container parts could not be added to the taxable value of the repair and maintenance service where the invoices separately showed labour and material charges and the materials used were supported by the record. The dispute was treated as covered by the appellant&#039;s earlier final order on the same issue, and the addition of repair material cost to the taxable value was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>