https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461104 Section 446 of the Companies Act gives the Company Court wide jurisdiction over proceedings against a company in liquidation, including a landlord's claim for recovery of possession from the Official Liquidator, to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and protect company assets. The existence of the Delhi Rent Control Act does not by itself oust that jurisdiction where eviction-related possession is sought in liquidation. The Court may still consider whether a statutory ground for eviction under the rent law exists and whether the premises are genuinely required by the liquidator. The application was held maintainable before the Company Court, and the challenge to the possession order failed. en-us Wed, 06 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Mar 2025 10:52:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461104 Section 446 of the Companies Act gives the Company Court wide jurisdiction over proceedings against a company in liquidation, including a landlord's claim for recovery of possession from the Official Liquidator, to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and protect company assets. The existence of the Delhi Rent Control Act does not by itself oust that jurisdiction where eviction-related possession is sought in liquidation. The Court may still consider whether a statutory ground for eviction under the rent law exists and whether the premises are genuinely required by the liquidator. The application was held maintainable before the Company Court, and the challenge to the possession order failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 06 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461104