https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767250 CESTAT Allahabad dismissed Revenue's appeal regarding seized gold. The Commissioner (Appeals) established that the respondent lawfully possessed the seized gold and successfully discharged the burden of proof required under Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962. The tribunal upheld the lower authority's finding that the gold was in lawful possession, confirming the respondent's compliance with statutory requirements for proving legitimate ownership of the seized goods. en-us Mon, 10 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Mar 2025 08:35:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767250 CESTAT Allahabad dismissed Revenue's appeal regarding seized gold. The Commissioner (Appeals) established that the respondent lawfully possessed the seized gold and successfully discharged the burden of proof required under Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962. The tribunal upheld the lower authority's finding that the gold was in lawful possession, confirming the respondent's compliance with statutory requirements for proving legitimate ownership of the seized goods. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 10 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767250