<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 639 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767253</link>
    <description>The HC addressed whether the Petitioner could release imported fresh garlic without a bank guarantee, focusing on SAFTA provisions and the goods&#039; country of origin. The Customs Department had concerns about documentation inconsistencies, particularly the port of loading in the UAE, which conflicted with the claimed Afghan origin. The Court allowed the Petitioner to clarify these discrepancies by submitting complete documentation to the Customs Department. The Court emphasized the need for expedited resolution due to the perishable nature of the goods and directed a decision by the next hearing. The petition was disposed of with compliance directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 08:35:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=806156" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 639 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767253</link>
      <description>The HC addressed whether the Petitioner could release imported fresh garlic without a bank guarantee, focusing on SAFTA provisions and the goods&#039; country of origin. The Customs Department had concerns about documentation inconsistencies, particularly the port of loading in the UAE, which conflicted with the claimed Afghan origin. The Court allowed the Petitioner to clarify these discrepancies by submitting complete documentation to the Customs Department. The Court emphasized the need for expedited resolution due to the perishable nature of the goods and directed a decision by the next hearing. The petition was disposed of with compliance directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>