<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 647 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767261</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the appellant company regarding unexplained cash deposits during demonetization. The tribunal found that the AO had accepted the company&#039;s audited books of accounts and trading results without pointing out deficiencies. Since the company had substantial cash sales recorded in day-to-day stock registers and VAT returns, and the AO accepted these sales, the cash deposits from such sales could not be treated as unexplained income under section 68. The tribunal held that making an addition would constitute double taxation of already offered income and deleted the addition under section 68 read with section 115BBE.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 08:35:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=806148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 647 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767261</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the appellant company regarding unexplained cash deposits during demonetization. The tribunal found that the AO had accepted the company&#039;s audited books of accounts and trading results without pointing out deficiencies. Since the company had substantial cash sales recorded in day-to-day stock registers and VAT returns, and the AO accepted these sales, the cash deposits from such sales could not be treated as unexplained income under section 68. The tribunal held that making an addition would constitute double taxation of already offered income and deleted the addition under section 68 read with section 115BBE.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>