<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (4) TMI 83 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42085</link>
    <description>The Court held that Tyrecord Warpsheets were not liable to Central Excise duty. The petitioner was entitled to a refund of the excise duty paid under protest. The principle of unjust enrichment applied, and the Court directed the refund to a Special Officer for distribution to rightful claimants. The Court did not address the delay and laches argument, focusing on the refund process instead. The appeal was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 10:24:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (4) TMI 83 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42085</link>
      <description>The Court held that Tyrecord Warpsheets were not liable to Central Excise duty. The petitioner was entitled to a refund of the excise duty paid under protest. The principle of unjust enrichment applied, and the Court directed the refund to a Special Officer for distribution to rightful claimants. The Court did not address the delay and laches argument, focusing on the refund process instead. The appeal was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>