<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 662 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767276</link>
    <description>Writ petitions challenging GST notices and orders were not entertained where the Tamil Nadu GST Act, 2017 provided an appellate remedy under Section 107. The court declined writ-stage interference on the objections relating to service of notices and orders, and directed the petitioner to pursue the statutory appeal. The operative effect was that the dispute was relegated to the appellate mechanism under the Act rather than being examined on writ jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 08:35:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=806133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 662 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767276</link>
      <description>Writ petitions challenging GST notices and orders were not entertained where the Tamil Nadu GST Act, 2017 provided an appellate remedy under Section 107. The court declined writ-stage interference on the objections relating to service of notices and orders, and directed the petitioner to pursue the statutory appeal. The operative effect was that the dispute was relegated to the appellate mechanism under the Act rather than being examined on writ jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>