https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767276 In the Madras HC, the petitioner sought to quash tax assessment orders under the GST Act, 2017, claiming improper service of notices. The respondent argued that the petitioner had an alternative remedy via appeal to the Appellate Deputy Commissioner (GST), Madurai, under Section 107 of the Tamil Nadu GST Act, 2017. The court directed the petitioner to file an appeal within one month, and the Appellate Deputy Commissioner was instructed to adjudicate within two months. The writ petitions were disposed of with no order as to costs. en-us Wed, 05 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Mar 2025 08:35:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767276 In the Madras HC, the petitioner sought to quash tax assessment orders under the GST Act, 2017, claiming improper service of notices. The respondent argued that the petitioner had an alternative remedy via appeal to the Appellate Deputy Commissioner (GST), Madurai, under Section 107 of the Tamil Nadu GST Act, 2017. The court directed the petitioner to file an appeal within one month, and the Appellate Deputy Commissioner was instructed to adjudicate within two months. The writ petitions were disposed of with no order as to costs. Case-Laws GST Wed, 05 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767276