<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 667 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767281</link>
    <description>A tax determination order was not interfered with because the taxpayer had received a show cause notice and repeated reminders but failed to respond or attend a personal hearing. Notice served through the statutory portal was treated as valid service, and a business regularly carrying on trade could not claim ignorance of such notices. Non-response to notices was held to be different from denial of an opportunity by the authority, so the challenge based on breach of hearing opportunity failed and writ interference was declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 14:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=806128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 667 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767281</link>
      <description>A tax determination order was not interfered with because the taxpayer had received a show cause notice and repeated reminders but failed to respond or attend a personal hearing. Notice served through the statutory portal was treated as valid service, and a business regularly carrying on trade could not claim ignorance of such notices. Non-response to notices was held to be different from denial of an opportunity by the authority, so the challenge based on breach of hearing opportunity failed and writ interference was declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>