https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767281 HC dismissed the challenge to the order under Section 73(9) of the CGST/KGST Act, finding the petitioner-a private limited business-was issued a show cause notice and three reminders via the statutory portal and thus had an opportunity of hearing. The court held failure to respond was petitioner's default, not denial of hearing, and therefore the writ remedy under Article 226 was inappropriate. The petition was dismissed. en-us Tue, 04 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Nov 2025 14:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767281 HC dismissed the challenge to the order under Section 73(9) of the CGST/KGST Act, finding the petitioner-a private limited business-was issued a show cause notice and three reminders via the statutory portal and thus had an opportunity of hearing. The court held failure to respond was petitioner's default, not denial of hearing, and therefore the writ remedy under Article 226 was inappropriate. The petition was dismissed. Case-Laws GST Tue, 04 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767281