<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 668 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767282</link>
    <description>HC held the Order-in-Original unsustainable because it proceeded on the incorrect premise that the petitioner had not filed a reply to the SCNs, thereby violating principles of natural justice. The procedural irregularity-failure to consider the petitioner&#039;s reply-rendered the impugned order invalid, and the writ petition was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 14:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=806127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 668 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767282</link>
      <description>HC held the Order-in-Original unsustainable because it proceeded on the incorrect premise that the petitioner had not filed a reply to the SCNs, thereby violating principles of natural justice. The procedural irregularity-failure to consider the petitioner&#039;s reply-rendered the impugned order invalid, and the writ petition was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767282</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>