<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (8) TMI 107 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42083</link>
    <description>Criminal liability under Section 9 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 could not be fastened on company directors or a manager unless the complaint specifically alleged that they were in charge of, or responsible for, the company&#039;s business or manufacture. A bare reference to their office in the company was insufficient because prosecution for excise contraventions requires a factual foundation showing personal role in the alleged breach. In the absence of such averments, the complaint did not disclose a proceedable case against them, and the proceedings were liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 10:18:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (8) TMI 107 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42083</link>
      <description>Criminal liability under Section 9 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 could not be fastened on company directors or a manager unless the complaint specifically alleged that they were in charge of, or responsible for, the company&#039;s business or manufacture. A bare reference to their office in the company was insufficient because prosecution for excise contraventions requires a factual foundation showing personal role in the alleged breach. In the absence of such averments, the complaint did not disclose a proceedable case against them, and the proceedings were liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>