<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1890 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461093</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi held that an assessment order passed in the name of a company that had merged with another entity and changed its name was not tenable. Following the precedent in Maruti Suzuki India Ltd case, the tribunal ruled that assessment orders cannot be validly issued against non-existent companies. The order was quashed as it was framed in the name of a company that no longer existed post-merger, with the decision favoring the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 19:03:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=806074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1890 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461093</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi held that an assessment order passed in the name of a company that had merged with another entity and changed its name was not tenable. Following the precedent in Maruti Suzuki India Ltd case, the tribunal ruled that assessment orders cannot be validly issued against non-existent companies. The order was quashed as it was framed in the name of a company that no longer existed post-merger, with the decision favoring the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>