<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1582 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461095</link>
    <description>Non-adjudication of a duly raised ground in an appellate order can constitute a mistake apparent from the record, making rectification permissible under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Where Ground No. 10 relating to deduction of technical know-how expenses was raised but not decided, the earlier order was recalled only to the extent necessary for adjudication of that ground. The miscellaneous application was therefore allowed, with the recall limited to curing the omission in the original appellate decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 19:03:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=806072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1582 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461095</link>
      <description>Non-adjudication of a duly raised ground in an appellate order can constitute a mistake apparent from the record, making rectification permissible under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Where Ground No. 10 relating to deduction of technical know-how expenses was raised but not decided, the earlier order was recalled only to the extent necessary for adjudication of that ground. The miscellaneous application was therefore allowed, with the recall limited to curing the omission in the original appellate decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>