<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (8) TMI 83 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYD.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42077</link>
    <description>For valuation of excisable goods under Section 4(4)(d)(ii) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, the deductible amount from a cum-duty price is only the effective excise duty actually payable where an exemption notification applies. The Explanation inserted by the Finance Act, 1982 with retrospective effect from 1-10-1975 was treated as part of the statutory scheme and as governing the computation of assessable value. It clarified that, in exempted cases, the deduction is limited to the duty actually payable after exemption, not the gross duty otherwise payable. The contrary view that the full duty could be excluded was no longer tenable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 10:00:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (8) TMI 83 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYD.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42077</link>
      <description>For valuation of excisable goods under Section 4(4)(d)(ii) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, the deductible amount from a cum-duty price is only the effective excise duty actually payable where an exemption notification applies. The Explanation inserted by the Finance Act, 1982 with retrospective effect from 1-10-1975 was treated as part of the statutory scheme and as governing the computation of assessable value. It clarified that, in exempted cases, the deduction is limited to the duty actually payable after exemption, not the gross duty otherwise payable. The contrary view that the full duty could be excluded was no longer tenable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>