<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (11) TMI 140 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461090</link>
    <description>Corrupt practice allegations in election matters are quasi-criminal and must be pleaded with clarity, specificity, and strict proof by the petitioner; the burden does not shift to the returned candidate. An election tribunal may insist on particulars and may refuse late amendment after limitation. A volunteer canvasser is not an agent of a candidate unless authority or consent is shown, and false-publication liability depends on proving agency and the requisite falsity or prejudice. Undue influence requires coercion, restraint, or domination, not mere advice or persuasion. On these principles, the proposed grounds were treated as factual, settled, or academic, and no substantial question was fit for certification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 18:21:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=806053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (11) TMI 140 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461090</link>
      <description>Corrupt practice allegations in election matters are quasi-criminal and must be pleaded with clarity, specificity, and strict proof by the petitioner; the burden does not shift to the returned candidate. An election tribunal may insist on particulars and may refuse late amendment after limitation. A volunteer canvasser is not an agent of a candidate unless authority or consent is shown, and false-publication liability depends on proving agency and the requisite falsity or prejudice. Undue influence requires coercion, restraint, or domination, not mere advice or persuasion. On these principles, the proposed grounds were treated as factual, settled, or academic, and no substantial question was fit for certification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>