https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461088 Interference in an appeal under Section 37 against an interim order under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is limited to cases where the tribunal's discretion is perverse or contrary to law. Prior ex parte orders in related proceedings did not finally determine the parties' rights, and a consent order permitting recourse to the tribunal did not exclude the respondent's statutory right to seek interim relief. The tribunal's direction allowing operation of the outlet was consistent with the contractual position that the respondent owned the land, structure, apparatus and equipment, while the appellant was only a licensee. The tribunal was also not functus officio merely because the contractual time limit expired, since the parties continued the arbitration by conduct and the objection was not raised in time. en-us Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Mar 2025 14:19:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461088 Interference in an appeal under Section 37 against an interim order under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is limited to cases where the tribunal's discretion is perverse or contrary to law. Prior ex parte orders in related proceedings did not finally determine the parties' rights, and a consent order permitting recourse to the tribunal did not exclude the respondent's statutory right to seek interim relief. The tribunal's direction allowing operation of the outlet was consistent with the contractual position that the respondent owned the land, structure, apparatus and equipment, while the appellant was only a licensee. The tribunal was also not functus officio merely because the contractual time limit expired, since the parties continued the arbitration by conduct and the objection was not raised in time. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461088