https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461087 Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 permits an appeal only from the orders expressly listed in that provision, reflecting the Act's policy of minimal judicial intervention. An order refusing leave to amend an application under Section 34 is not one of the appealable orders enumerated in Section 37. The Court therefore held that no appeal lay against the interlocutory refusal and that the appeal was not maintainable, leaving the party to any other remedy available in law. en-us Thu, 01 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Mar 2025 12:35:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461087 Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 permits an appeal only from the orders expressly listed in that provision, reflecting the Act's policy of minimal judicial intervention. An order refusing leave to amend an application under Section 34 is not one of the appealable orders enumerated in Section 37. The Court therefore held that no appeal lay against the interlocutory refusal and that the appeal was not maintainable, leaving the party to any other remedy available in law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 01 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461087