https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42064 Where a statutory appeal was available under Section 35-B of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, the Court declined to grant interim stay of recovery of duty, penalty and redemption fine through writ jurisdiction and required the petitioner to seek relief before the appellate authority. The Court noted the three-month period for filing the appeal and exercised judicial restraint in withholding writ-based interim protection. It also recorded that recovery proceedings would remain suspended for the period contemplated by Departmental Circular No. 29 of 1982, which the respondent stated it would follow. The writ petition was dismissed, leaving interim stay to the statutory forum. en-us Fri, 22 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Jun 2010 18:29:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42064 Where a statutory appeal was available under Section 35-B of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, the Court declined to grant interim stay of recovery of duty, penalty and redemption fine through writ jurisdiction and required the petitioner to seek relief before the appellate authority. The Court noted the three-month period for filing the appeal and exercised judicial restraint in withholding writ-based interim protection. It also recorded that recovery proceedings would remain suspended for the period contemplated by Departmental Circular No. 29 of 1982, which the respondent stated it would follow. The writ petition was dismissed, leaving interim stay to the statutory forum. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 22 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42064