<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 616 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767230</link>
    <description>ITAT Pune allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes regarding rejection of section 80G registration. The CIT(E) had rejected the application due to the assessee&#039;s failure to respond to notices and address discrepancies in the application process. The tribunal restored the matter to CIT(E) with directions to grant one final opportunity to the assessee to substantiate its case by filing requisite details and decide the issue on merits according to facts and law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 09:07:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=805927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 616 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767230</link>
      <description>ITAT Pune allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes regarding rejection of section 80G registration. The CIT(E) had rejected the application due to the assessee&#039;s failure to respond to notices and address discrepancies in the application process. The tribunal restored the matter to CIT(E) with directions to grant one final opportunity to the assessee to substantiate its case by filing requisite details and decide the issue on merits according to facts and law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>