<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (2) TMI 76 - HIGH COURT OF JURIDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42062</link>
    <description>A reference application under Section 35G(3) of the Central Excise Act was treated as not maintainable where an earlier application had already been rejected as arising from an interim order and the Tribunal later decided the appeal on merits. The proper course was to seek reference after the final appellate order, but the present application still sought reference on questions already concluded in that final order. On that basis, the application was held misconceived and liable to dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 18:26:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (2) TMI 76 - HIGH COURT OF JURIDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42062</link>
      <description>A reference application under Section 35G(3) of the Central Excise Act was treated as not maintainable where an earlier application had already been rejected as arising from an interim order and the Tribunal later decided the appeal on merits. The proper course was to seek reference after the final appellate order, but the present application still sought reference on questions already concluded in that final order. On that basis, the application was held misconceived and liable to dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>