https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767172 A complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was held maintainable where it was instituted through an authorised company representative supported by board resolution, further delegation, and Articles of Association permitting such authorisation. On the merits, the cheques were admitted, the business liability was acknowledged in the reply notice, and no reliable evidence rebutted the statutory presumption or proved repayment. The Trial Court and Appellate Court findings were supported by documentary and oral evidence and showed no perversity, so revision interference was unwarranted. The conviction under Section 138 was therefore left undisturbed. en-us Fri, 28 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Mar 2025 14:58:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767172 A complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was held maintainable where it was instituted through an authorised company representative supported by board resolution, further delegation, and Articles of Association permitting such authorisation. On the merits, the cheques were admitted, the business liability was acknowledged in the reply notice, and no reliable evidence rebutted the statutory presumption or proved repayment. The Trial Court and Appellate Court findings were supported by documentary and oral evidence and showed no perversity, so revision interference was unwarranted. The conviction under Section 138 was therefore left undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 28 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767172