https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42059 An ex parte dismissal of an appeal was unsustainable where the appellate record showed the petitioner's regular and the delay was attributable to the co-accused's absence; the incorrect next-date entry was supported by the material on record, so the dismissal was liable to be set aside. An order directing cost or compensation could not be justified under Section 357(3) CrPC because compensation is confined to cases where the court imposes a sentence not including fine and only for loss or injury caused by the offence; the impugned direction therefore had no legal basis. en-us Fri, 14 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Jun 2010 18:21:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42059 An ex parte dismissal of an appeal was unsustainable where the appellate record showed the petitioner's regular and the delay was attributable to the co-accused's absence; the incorrect next-date entry was supported by the material on record, so the dismissal was liable to be set aside. An order directing cost or compensation could not be justified under Section 357(3) CrPC because compensation is confined to cases where the court imposes a sentence not including fine and only for loss or injury caused by the offence; the impugned direction therefore had no legal basis. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 14 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42059