<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 591 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767205</link>
    <description>Reassessment beyond four years is invalid where it rests on the same material already on record and no failure to make full and true disclosure of material facts is shown; on that basis, the reopening notice and consequential reassessment were quashed. UK film tax relief already embedded in the receipt chain could not be taxed again as a separate income item, so the addition was deleted. Payments to Winford Production Ltd. for film-production reimbursements, including local arrangements and logistics, did not make available technical knowledge, skill, know-how, or process; they were not fees for technical services, and no withholding disallowance could survive. The Revenue&#039;s appeal failed and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2025 13:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=805851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 591 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767205</link>
      <description>Reassessment beyond four years is invalid where it rests on the same material already on record and no failure to make full and true disclosure of material facts is shown; on that basis, the reopening notice and consequential reassessment were quashed. UK film tax relief already embedded in the receipt chain could not be taxed again as a separate income item, so the addition was deleted. Payments to Winford Production Ltd. for film-production reimbursements, including local arrangements and logistics, did not make available technical knowledge, skill, know-how, or process; they were not fees for technical services, and no withholding disallowance could survive. The Revenue&#039;s appeal failed and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>