<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 609 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767223</link>
    <description>The SC found procedural violations in a tax order under Section 73 of CGST Act. The order was set aside due to lack of proper notice and opportunity to be heard. The court directed the tax authorities to provide a fair hearing, de-freeze the petitioner&#039;s bank account, and reconsider the original tax assessment with proper procedural compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 09:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=805833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 609 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767223</link>
      <description>The SC found procedural violations in a tax order under Section 73 of CGST Act. The order was set aside due to lack of proper notice and opportunity to be heard. The court directed the tax authorities to provide a fair hearing, de-freeze the petitioner&#039;s bank account, and reconsider the original tax assessment with proper procedural compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>