https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42049 Where the purchase price of skelp already included excise duty realised by the supplier under the Joint Plant Committee arrangement, the revenue could not demand the same duty again from the purchaser on the same transaction. The Court rejected the suggestion that the purchaser should first recover the amount from the supplier and then pay the department, treating that approach as unfair and unsupported. The operative effect was to prevent double recovery of excise duty on the same goods, and the writ was allowed to that extent without costs. en-us Thu, 27 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Jun 2010 17:55:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42049 Where the purchase price of skelp already included excise duty realised by the supplier under the Joint Plant Committee arrangement, the revenue could not demand the same duty again from the purchaser on the same transaction. The Court rejected the suggestion that the purchaser should first recover the amount from the supplier and then pay the department, treating that approach as unfair and unsupported. The operative effect was to prevent double recovery of excise duty on the same goods, and the writ was allowed to that extent without costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 27 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42049