<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (10) TMI 58 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42047</link>
    <description>A dismissal as withdrawn does not operate as res judicata because it is not an adjudication on merits, so a later petition is not barred on that ground. The note also states that criminal prosecution under the Customs Act is unsustainable where the departmental appellate authority, on the same facts and evidence, has set aside confiscation and penalty and found the alleged contravention unproved; identical factual findings in adjudication undermine the prosecution, especially given the higher criminal standard of proof.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 17:48:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (10) TMI 58 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42047</link>
      <description>A dismissal as withdrawn does not operate as res judicata because it is not an adjudication on merits, so a later petition is not barred on that ground. The note also states that criminal prosecution under the Customs Act is unsustainable where the departmental appellate authority, on the same facts and evidence, has set aside confiscation and penalty and found the alleged contravention unproved; identical factual findings in adjudication undermine the prosecution, especially given the higher criminal standard of proof.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>