<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (8) TMI 102 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42046</link>
    <description>Packing-value provisions were construed strictly, as they extend excise levy beyond the manufactured article itself. Where the assessee&#039;s own wrapper paper had already suffered excise duty separately, its value could not be added again to the assessable value of the core paper merely because the goods were cleared in packed condition. Including the duty-paid packing material would amount to a second levy on the same excisable article without authority of law, so the inclusion was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 17:36:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (8) TMI 102 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42046</link>
      <description>Packing-value provisions were construed strictly, as they extend excise levy beyond the manufactured article itself. Where the assessee&#039;s own wrapper paper had already suffered excise duty separately, its value could not be added again to the assessable value of the core paper merely because the goods were cleared in packed condition. Including the duty-paid packing material would amount to a second levy on the same excisable article without authority of law, so the inclusion was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>