<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 581 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461070</link>
    <description>A company can depose only through a witness who is duly authorised under its Articles of Association or by a specific Board resolution. Where the alleged representative produced no documentary proof of directorship or authorisation, and no Board resolution was placed on record, the court could rightly treat the witness as unauthorised. On that basis, the finding of lack of proof of authority was upheld and no ground was made out to interfere with the acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 15:39:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=805694" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 581 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461070</link>
      <description>A company can depose only through a witness who is duly authorised under its Articles of Association or by a specific Board resolution. Where the alleged representative produced no documentary proof of directorship or authorisation, and no Board resolution was placed on record, the court could rightly treat the witness as unauthorised. On that basis, the finding of lack of proof of authority was upheld and no ground was made out to interfere with the acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>