<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (10) TMI 55 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42040</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed, affirming the judgment that the Customs Officer did not have the authority to complete the assessment before the grant of entry inwards. The Court emphasized that duty assessment should be finalized post entry inwards as per relevant sections of the Customs Act. The duty liability was upheld based on the date of entry inwards, and the discrimination claim against Customs authorities was rejected due to lack of substantiation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 17:19:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (10) TMI 55 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42040</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed, affirming the judgment that the Customs Officer did not have the authority to complete the assessment before the grant of entry inwards. The Court emphasized that duty assessment should be finalized post entry inwards as per relevant sections of the Customs Act. The duty liability was upheld based on the date of entry inwards, and the discrimination claim against Customs authorities was rejected due to lack of substantiation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>