https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767105 HC quashed orders demanding 10% pre-deposit of grant-in-aid amount as precondition for hearing petitioner's representation. Court held the demand lacked statutory foundation and was inappropriate at representation stage rather than appellate level. Orders were passed without providing hearing opportunity to petitioner, violating natural justice principles. The belated demand in April 2023 for representation pending since December 2020 was unreasonable. Authorities directed to consider representation within three months without requiring pre-deposit. Petition allowed. en-us Tue, 04 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Mar 2025 18:31:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767105 HC quashed orders demanding 10% pre-deposit of grant-in-aid amount as precondition for hearing petitioner's representation. Court held the demand lacked statutory foundation and was inappropriate at representation stage rather than appellate level. Orders were passed without providing hearing opportunity to petitioner, violating natural justice principles. The belated demand in April 2023 for representation pending since December 2020 was unreasonable. Authorities directed to consider representation within three months without requiring pre-deposit. Petition allowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 04 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767105