https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767112 Adjournment in a CESTAT appeal is limited to sufficient cause and not more than three occasions under the Central Excise Act, while the Tribunal may dismiss a matter for default when the appellant does not appear. Repeated absence on multiple hearing dates and prior adjournments exhausted the permissible discretion, leaving no basis for any further adjournment. The appeal was therefore dismissed for non-prosecution. en-us Tue, 04 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Mar 2025 08:33:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767112 Adjournment in a CESTAT appeal is limited to sufficient cause and not more than three occasions under the Central Excise Act, while the Tribunal may dismiss a matter for default when the appellant does not appear. Repeated absence on multiple hearing dates and prior adjournments exhausted the permissible discretion, leaving no basis for any further adjournment. The appeal was therefore dismissed for non-prosecution. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 04 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767112