<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 513 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767127</link>
    <description>Appellate limitation under the insolvency framework is computed by excluding the date of the impugned order, so limitation runs from the date of pronouncement and not from alleged later knowledge. On that computation, the appeal was delayed by 11 days, which remained within the Tribunal&#039;s 15-day condonable limit. The explanation in the application and affidavit was accepted as sufficient cause, and the delay was condoned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 17:37:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=805583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 513 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767127</link>
      <description>Appellate limitation under the insolvency framework is computed by excluding the date of the impugned order, so limitation runs from the date of pronouncement and not from alleged later knowledge. On that computation, the appeal was delayed by 11 days, which remained within the Tribunal&#039;s 15-day condonable limit. The explanation in the application and affidavit was accepted as sufficient cause, and the delay was condoned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>