<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 542 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767156</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging an adjudication order under the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act was held not maintainable because an efficacious statutory appeal under Section 107 was available. The High Court reiterated that writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not exercised where an adequate appellate remedy exists, absent exceptional circumstances. The petitioner&#039;s grievance regarding cross-examination did not justify interference at the writ stage, as that issue could be pursued in the statutory appeal. The court therefore declined to interfere with the adjudication order and left the petitioner to avail the appellate remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2025 14:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=805554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 542 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767156</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging an adjudication order under the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act was held not maintainable because an efficacious statutory appeal under Section 107 was available. The High Court reiterated that writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not exercised where an adequate appellate remedy exists, absent exceptional circumstances. The petitioner&#039;s grievance regarding cross-examination did not justify interference at the writ stage, as that issue could be pursued in the statutory appeal. The court therefore declined to interfere with the adjudication order and left the petitioner to avail the appellate remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>