https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767158 A writ petition challenging seizure proceedings under the Rajasthan Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, including release of seized goods and vehicle and the penalty and confiscation orders, was not entertained because an efficacious appellate remedy was available. The High Court declined to decide the dispute on merits and relegated the petitioner to the appellate forum. It also protected the petitioner's position by observing that if an appeal is filed within three months of the Tribunal's constitution, it would be treated as filed within limitation. en-us Thu, 13 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Jun 2025 10:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767158 A writ petition challenging seizure proceedings under the Rajasthan Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, including release of seized goods and vehicle and the penalty and confiscation orders, was not entertained because an efficacious appellate remedy was available. The High Court declined to decide the dispute on merits and relegated the petitioner to the appellate forum. It also protected the petitioner's position by observing that if an appeal is filed within three months of the Tribunal's constitution, it would be treated as filed within limitation. Case-Laws GST Thu, 13 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767158