<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1706 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461069</link>
    <description>Successive bail applications are maintainable only on fresh grounds or a material change in circumstances that directly affects the earlier refusal. The Court found no subsequent development or new material to justify reconsideration, as the earlier bail rejections had already addressed the extradition background, alleged flight risk, prosecution case, and prolonged custody. Reliance on Section 436A of the Code of Criminal Procedure was also unavailable because the Supreme Court had already declined that basis and the allegations included serious offences carrying severe punishment. Continued incarceration by itself was therefore insufficient, and bail was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 11:28:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=805511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1706 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461069</link>
      <description>Successive bail applications are maintainable only on fresh grounds or a material change in circumstances that directly affects the earlier refusal. The Court found no subsequent development or new material to justify reconsideration, as the earlier bail rejections had already addressed the extradition background, alleged flight risk, prosecution case, and prolonged custody. Reliance on Section 436A of the Code of Criminal Procedure was also unavailable because the Supreme Court had already declined that basis and the allegations included serious offences carrying severe punishment. Continued incarceration by itself was therefore insufficient, and bail was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>