https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461065 The Supreme Court examined whether the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and its regulations adequately address milk adulteration, and treated the existing framework as a comprehensive regime covering licensing, standards, hygiene, penalties, and public risk communication. It found the law sufficient in principle but requiring stronger enforcement. The Court then directed targeted sampling, improved laboratory capacity, periodic surveys, high-risk area monitoring, complaint mechanisms, consumer awareness measures, and State and district committees, while also suggesting that the Union consider stronger penal amendments to enhance deterrence. en-us Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Mar 2025 17:18:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461065 The Supreme Court examined whether the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and its regulations adequately address milk adulteration, and treated the existing framework as a comprehensive regime covering licensing, standards, hygiene, penalties, and public risk communication. It found the law sufficient in principle but requiring stronger enforcement. The Court then directed targeted sampling, improved laboratory capacity, periodic surveys, high-risk area monitoring, complaint mechanisms, consumer awareness measures, and State and district committees, while also suggesting that the Union consider stronger penal amendments to enhance deterrence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461065