https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42020 The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling that the discrimination claim lacked substantiating evidence and that the interpretation of Section 25 of the Customs Act did not warrant court intervention. The company's arguments failed to demonstrate discrimination or establish a case for exemption from customs duty, as the cited legal precedent was deemed inapplicable. The judgment underscored the necessity of presenting relevant evidence and legal arguments to support claims, resulting in the rejection of both the discrimination claim and the petition. en-us Sat, 18 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Jun 2010 16:26:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42020 The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling that the discrimination claim lacked substantiating evidence and that the interpretation of Section 25 of the Customs Act did not warrant court intervention. The company's arguments failed to demonstrate discrimination or establish a case for exemption from customs duty, as the cited legal precedent was deemed inapplicable. The judgment underscored the necessity of presenting relevant evidence and legal arguments to support claims, resulting in the rejection of both the discrimination claim and the petition. Case-Laws Customs Sat, 18 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42020