https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42018 Preventive detention was quashed because the detaining authority failed to consider repeated bail applications and a conditional bail order, showing non-application of mind to material facts bearing on subjective satisfaction. The detention also failed because the order was passed and served after substantial, unexplained delay, with no concrete explanation for the intervening period or the delay in execution. The court treated both omissions as fatal to the detention, holding that material bail circumstances must be considered and that unexplained delay can break the nexus between the prejudicial activity and preventive detention. en-us Wed, 29 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Jun 2010 16:20:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42018 Preventive detention was quashed because the detaining authority failed to consider repeated bail applications and a conditional bail order, showing non-application of mind to material facts bearing on subjective satisfaction. The detention also failed because the order was passed and served after substantial, unexplained delay, with no concrete explanation for the intervening period or the delay in execution. The court treated both omissions as fatal to the detention, holding that material bail circumstances must be considered and that unexplained delay can break the nexus between the prejudicial activity and preventive detention. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 29 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42018