https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42017 Preventive detention under the Foreign Exchange Conservation framework was found unsustainable where the grounds rested on factual inaccuracies and misconceived inferences, and where exculpatory material supporting the detenu's explanation was not properly considered. Detention was also treated as impermissible double detention because the detenu was already in custody and no compelling necessity for a preventive order was shown despite onerous bail conditions. The order was further undermined by an unexplained delay of nearly three months, which broke the required proximity between the alleged prejudicial activity and the detention action. en-us Mon, 03 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Jun 2010 16:16:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42017 Preventive detention under the Foreign Exchange Conservation framework was found unsustainable where the grounds rested on factual inaccuracies and misconceived inferences, and where exculpatory material supporting the detenu's explanation was not properly considered. Detention was also treated as impermissible double detention because the detenu was already in custody and no compelling necessity for a preventive order was shown despite onerous bail conditions. The order was further undermined by an unexplained delay of nearly three months, which broke the required proximity between the alleged prejudicial activity and the detention action. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 03 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42017