https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42016 Preventive detention requires strict compliance with Article 22(5): the detention order, grounds and relied-upon material must be supplied in the language understood by the detenu, and English or Hindi copies do not suffice where that language is not understood. The High Court held that this defect vitiated the detention. The detention was also invalid because the detenu was not given an effective hearing before the Advisory Board; he was removed due to illness and was not recalled despite time remaining. On the record, the material, centred on a retracted customs statement and a co-accused's statement, was insufficient to justify continued detention, so the order was set aside. en-us Wed, 02 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Jun 2010 16:04:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42016 Preventive detention requires strict compliance with Article 22(5): the detention order, grounds and relied-upon material must be supplied in the language understood by the detenu, and English or Hindi copies do not suffice where that language is not understood. The High Court held that this defect vitiated the detention. The detention was also invalid because the detenu was not given an effective hearing before the Advisory Board; he was removed due to illness and was not recalled despite time remaining. On the record, the material, centred on a retracted customs statement and a co-accused's statement, was insufficient to justify continued detention, so the order was set aside. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 02 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42016