https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42014 Prima facie false claims already satisfied in earlier proceedings, repeated refund demands on the same basis, and false averments denying prior petitions were treated as sufficient material to indicate possible fraudulent conduct, false evidence, and an attempt to obtain money not due. On that footing, notice was directed to explain why prosecution should not be launched for offences relating to false evidence, false claim in court, and attempt to commit such offence. en-us Thu, 15 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Jun 2010 16:00:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42014 Prima facie false claims already satisfied in earlier proceedings, repeated refund demands on the same basis, and false averments denying prior petitions were treated as sufficient material to indicate possible fraudulent conduct, false evidence, and an attempt to obtain money not due. On that footing, notice was directed to explain why prosecution should not be launched for offences relating to false evidence, false claim in court, and attempt to commit such offence. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 15 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42014