<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (10) TMI 51 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42012</link>
    <description>Retrospective amendments to Rules 9 and 49 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, and Section 51 of the Finance Act, 1982 were upheld as constitutionally valid because the deeming fiction treated goods used in a continuous or integrated manufacturing process as removed before consumption, without violating statutory limits on recovery or Articles 14 and 19(1)(g). Intermediate yarn produced in a composite mill and consumed for weaving fabrics was held liable to excise duty under that amended scheme. The contrary departmental circular and the absence of a separate Collector&#039;s specification did not defeat the levy, although no second duty could be imposed merely because the yarn was later sized for weaving.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 13:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (10) TMI 51 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42012</link>
      <description>Retrospective amendments to Rules 9 and 49 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, and Section 51 of the Finance Act, 1982 were upheld as constitutionally valid because the deeming fiction treated goods used in a continuous or integrated manufacturing process as removed before consumption, without violating statutory limits on recovery or Articles 14 and 19(1)(g). Intermediate yarn produced in a composite mill and consumed for weaving fabrics was held liable to excise duty under that amended scheme. The contrary departmental circular and the absence of a separate Collector&#039;s specification did not defeat the levy, although no second duty could be imposed merely because the yarn was later sized for weaving.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>