https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42008 The court allowed the appeals, directing the respondents to levy additional duty at the rate specified in the first notification on the imported goods. The excess duty collected was to be refunded, bank guarantees discharged, and no costs were awarded. The plea of promissory estoppel was upheld as the Government failed to justify amending the initial notification without sufficient public interest grounds. The application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court was denied, citing precedent supporting the application of promissory estoppel in similar circumstances. en-us Tue, 04 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Jun 2010 15:35:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42008 The court allowed the appeals, directing the respondents to levy additional duty at the rate specified in the first notification on the imported goods. The excess duty collected was to be refunded, bank guarantees discharged, and no costs were awarded. The plea of promissory estoppel was upheld as the Government failed to justify amending the initial notification without sufficient public interest grounds. The application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court was denied, citing precedent supporting the application of promissory estoppel in similar circumstances. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 04 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42008