<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1719 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461056</link>
    <description>Jurisdiction under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is confined to deciding whether bail should be granted or refused pending trial, and once that application is finally disposed of the court&#039;s seisin in that proceeding ends. The High Court could not retain the file after granting bail or issue further policy-oriented directions on district-wise criminal data, investigation reform, or broader criminal justice administration, because those directions travelled beyond the subject matter of the bail proceeding. The subsequent directions were therefore unsustainable, and the impugned order dated 24 April 2019 was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 13:27:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=805366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1719 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461056</link>
      <description>Jurisdiction under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is confined to deciding whether bail should be granted or refused pending trial, and once that application is finally disposed of the court&#039;s seisin in that proceeding ends. The High Court could not retain the file after granting bail or issue further policy-oriented directions on district-wise criminal data, investigation reform, or broader criminal justice administration, because those directions travelled beyond the subject matter of the bail proceeding. The subsequent directions were therefore unsustainable, and the impugned order dated 24 April 2019 was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>